|
Florissant
Fossil Beds National Monument
|
Florissant, Colorado: Geology
|
Pikes
Peak Granite
Pikes Peak, at an elevation of 4,300 m, is
just 19 km southeast of Florissant. Pikes Peak granite
has a
radiometric
age
of 1,080 Ma (Evanoff, McIntosh & Murphy, 2001, p.
3). The billion year old pink Pikes Peak granite formed
as an intrusive batholith during the Precambrian and
covers 2,978 square kilometers (Foos & Hannibal,
1999, p. 1). The mountain building episode known as the
Larimide Orogeny, which started in the Late Cretaceous
65 to 70 Ma ago, created the current Rocky Mountains
and resulted in the uplift and exposure of the Pikes
Peak Granite
(Meyer, 2003, p. 23). During the Late Eocene, rivers
eroded the granite to form a valley. Late Eocene sediments
from
volcanic activity, lakes, and rivers, filled the valley
depositing the rock units in the Florissant Formation.
|
Mary
Klass, resting comfortably atop Pikes Peak Granite
|
Wall Mountain Tuff
The
Wall Mountain Tuff, dated at 36.7 Ma, records the
oldest known Paleogene volcanic activity at Florissant.
An
explosive volcanic eruption 80 km to the west of Florissant
resulted
in a pyroclastic flow--an incandescent cloud of gas
and debris with temperatures of 1,000 degrees Celsius traveling
at speeds of 160 km/h or more. The gasses in ash flows
suspend the hot debris, which allow the volcanic material
to travel
as far as 120 km or more (Matthews, KellerLynn & Fox,
2003, p. 10). The pyroclastic flow followed the contours
of the landscape and swept through the Florissant
valley. As the flow came to rest, the hot material
fused into
an ignimbrite or welded rhyolitic tuff. The Wall
Mountain Tuff carpeted the Florissant paleovalley
and, subsequently,
experienced erosion before the deposition of the
Florissant Formation.
Unconformities represent
gaps in the sedimentary geologic record between two rock
masses of different ages and indicate that the deposition
of sediments was not continuous. An unconformity can represent
either time during which no sediments were deposited or
time during which rock layers have been eroded away. The
unconformity between the Pikes Peak Granite and the Wall
Mountain Tuff represents 1.04 billion years of missing
time. All of the Paleozoic, Mesozoic, Paleocene and early
Eocene rock units have been eroded away (KellerLynn, 2006,
p. 21).
Today,
outcrops of the Wall Mountain Tuff appear throughout
the Florissant
Valley. Remnants of the Wall Mountain Tuff
in Castle Rock, just south of Denver, indicate that
this ancient
pyroclastic flow traveled at least 150 km from the eruption
site (Meyer, 2003, p. 25). Castle Rock Rhyolite is a
dimensional stone made from the Wall Mountain Tuff.
The gray blocks
used to construct Molly Brown’s house were quarried
from the Wall Mountain Tuff in Castle Rock (Mathews et
al., 2003, p. 122).
Another
unconformity lies between the eroded surface of the Wall
Mountain Tuff and younger sedimentary rock units. In
most areas the unconformity is between the Wall Mountain
Tuff
and the Florissant Formation. There are some places in
which the Florissant Formation abuts laterally against
the Wall Mountain Tuff, an unusual arrangement for an
unconformity. On the southeast side of the monument it
lies between the
Wall Mountain Tuff and the Tertiary boulder conglomerate.
The Tertiary boulder conglomerate contains boulders and
cobbles of granite, gneiss, schist, clasts of tuff from
the Wall Mountain Tuff and fragments of petrified wood.
Streams and debris flows deposited the Tertiary boulder
conglomerate. This unconformity represents missing time
during the Eocene (Evanoff et al., 2001, p. 4; KellerLynn,
2006, p. 21 & 25).
|
Wall
Mountain Tuff Exposure at Barksdale Picnic Area
|
Florissant Formation
Two million years after the formation of the Wall Mountain Tuff,
volcanic activity in an area known as the Thirtynine Mile volcanic
field, located a mere 25 to 30 km southwest of the ancient
Florissant basin, would help to form the famous fossil beds
at Florissant. The Guffey volcano was situated among a cluster
of towering stratovolcanoes within the Thirtynine Mile area.
Eruptions from the Guffey volcano produced pyroclastic flows,
ash falls, and lahars (volcanic mudflows). Periodically, the
lahars acted as dams to the Florissant valley, creating ancient
Florissant lakes (Evanoff et al., 2001, p. 8). The rock units
of the Florissant Formation record the existence of rivers,
volcanic activity, and lakes within Florissant valley. Fossils
from some of these rock units faithfully record portions of
Florissant ecosystems of the Late Eocene.
The Florissant Formation was deposited upon the eroded surfaces
of the Pikes Peak Granite and the Wall Mountain Tuff. Six informal
units make up the Florissant Formation and include from bottom
to top: the lower shale, the lower mudstone, the middle shale,
the caprock conglomerate, the upper shale, and the upper pumice
conglomerate (Evanoff et al., 2001, p. 8).
Multiple
lines of evidence indicate a late Eocene age for the Florissant
Formation, which accords with the current
placement of the Eocene-Oligocene boundary at 33.7 Ma. The
Florissant
Formation is dated at 34.07 Ma based on volcanic minerals
in the formation (Evanoff et al., 2001, p. 14). The overlapping
range of brotontheres and Mesohippus indicates a Chadronian
age (37-34 Ma) for the mammalian fauna of Florissant. The
70
meter Florissant Formation is almost entirely reversed in
polarity and is most logically correlated with Chron C13, which
spans
33.7-34.7 Ma (Prothero & Sanchez, 2004, p. 145). Thus,
radiometric dating, mammalian fossil fauna, and the magnetic
stratigraphy of Florissant corroborate a latest Eocene age
for the Florissant Formation.
The Florissant Formation
represents both fluvial (river) and lacustrine (lake) environments.
An initial lake in the paleovalley
became filled with sediments over many years, after which
a stream valley developed. Evidence suggests lahars traveling
down side tributary valleys eventually formed a natural dam,
re-establishing lake conditions. Renewed volcanic activity
resulted in a lahar deposit that entered parts of the second
reservoir-like lake. Eventually, the deposition of a pumice
conglomerate marks the end of lake conditions. Let’s
take a closer look at the major units in the Florissant Formation.
Lower Shale Unit
The lower shale unit represents deposition within an early
Florissant lake and is composed of alternating paper shale
and tuffaceous siltstone. Volcanic conglomerates are also
interspersed throughout the unit. Repeated deposition of
ash and clay at the bottom of Lake Florissant trapped a variety
of organisms. The shale from this unit contains the fossils
of plants, insects, fish, and birds. Insects and leaves from
the lower shale unit can be collected at the private Florissant
Fossil Quarry, just outside Florissant Fossil Beds National
Monument.
|
Lower Shale Unit at Florissant Fossil Quarry |
Lower Mudstone Unit
The lower mudstone unit consists of mudstones, conglomerates,
and sandstones. Ribbons of sandstones and conglomerates within
this unit trace the course of stream channels. The lower mudstone
unit represents a river system within the Florissant Valley.
A 5 meter layer of sandy mudstone at the top of this unit records
a lahar deposit that buried parts of a forest growing by the
stream in the ancient Florissant valley. The mudflow represents
a single event that encased trees in situ (Gregory-Wodzicki,
2001, p.164). Over time, trees buried in place were permineralized
with silica released from the volcanic rocks to form a petrified
forest. The lower mudstone unit is exposed behind the Big Stump
with the middle shale unit and caprock conglomerate above.
|
“Big Stump” Type
Specimen
Sequoioxylon pearsallii (Andrews 1936)
Eocene; Florissant Formation
Colorado
|
Middle Shale Unit
Additional lahars flowed down the valley eventually damming the
Florissant drainage. Water filled the valley and its tributaries
forming a second lake Florissant, which was 1.5 kilometers
wide and 20 km long (Meyer, 2003, p. 29). The middle shale
unit consists of paper shales, pumice conglomerate, and volcanic
siltstone beds (Evanoff et al., 2001, p. 7). Paper shales found
within the Florissant Formation consist of alternating layers
of diatomite and volcanic ash-clay. Repeated deposition of
volcanic ash within the lake triggered abundant diatom growth.
Fossils are found within the layers formed by the deposition
of diatoms (O’brien, Meyer, Reilly, Ross, and Maguire,
2002). Within the monument, it is the middle shale unit that
provides the wealth of fossil insects and leaves. Fossils of
fish, mollusks, and ostracods are rare within the middle shale
unit.
Caprock Conglomerate
The caprock conglomerate consists of granular muddy conglomerate
beds. The caprock conglomerate overlies parts of the middle shale
unit and protects it by slowing the erosional process. The caprock
conglomerate represents debris flow perhaps a lahar that entered
the lake. The middle shale unit and caprock conglomerate can be
seen in several locations along the trails.
|
Middle Shale Unit and Caprock Conglomerate |
Upper Shale Unit
The upper shale unit follows the caprock conglomerate and represents
lacustrine or lake deposition after the lahar entered the lake.
In the northwest corner of the monument the upper shale unit
overlies the middle shale unit. Like the middle shale unit,
the upper shale unit consists of alternating paper shales and
pumice conglomerate beds. Fossils of plants, insects, fish scales
and ostracods are
found within this unit. The upper shale unit is different from
the middle shale unit in its abundance of ostracods and fingernail
clam shells (Evanoff et al., 2001, p. 11). The upper shale unit
is exposed along Boulder Creek.
|
Florissant Upper Shale and Upper Pumice Conglomerate |
Upper Pumice Conglomerate
The upper pumice conglomerate unit consists of pumice-rich white
sandstones and conglomerates. Fossil finger clams found in
the lower part of this unit indicate the pumice conglomerate
was deposited into Lake Florissant. The upper cross-bedded
conglomerate beds represent deposition by streams within the
valley, recording an end to the Florissant lake. The upper
pumice conglomerate is exposed north of Boulder Creek (Evanoff
et al., 2001, p. 11).
The
youngest unconformity rests between the upper pumice conglomerate
and Quaternary deposits. This unconformity represents 32
million years of missing time from the Oligocene, Miocene,
and Pliocene Epochs (KellerLynn, 2006, p. 21). Pleistocene
deposits at Florissant are composed of weathered and eroded
Pikes Peak Granite, Wall Mountain Tuff, and fragments of
shale, mudstone, sandstone, and fossil wood from the Florissant
Formation. Parts of the Florissant Formation that have
survived weathering and erosion are exposed around the
perimeter of the old lake (KellerLynn, 2006, p. 26).
|
Bibliography
|
Evanoff,
E., McIntosh, W.C. and Murphey, P.C. (2001). Stratigraphic
Summary and 40Ar/39Ar Geocrhonology of the Florissant Formation,
Colorado. In Evanoff, E., Gregory-Wodzicki K.M. and Johnson,
K.R. [Eds.] Fossil Flora and Stratigraphy of the Florissant
Formation, Colorado. (pp. 1-16). Proceedings of the
Denver Museum of Nature and Science, series 4, number 1.
Foos,
A. & Hannibal, J. (1999). Geology of Florissant Fossil
Beds National Monument.
http://www.nature.nps.gov/geology/education/foos/flfo.pdf
Gregory-Wodzicki,
K. M. (2001). Paleoclimatic Implications of Tree-Ring Growth Characteristics
of 34.1 Ma Sequoioxylon pearsallii from Florissant, Colorado. In Evanoff, E.,
Gregory-Wodzicki K.M. and Johnson, K.R. [Eds.] Fossil Flora and Stratigraphy
of the Florissant Formation, Colorado. (pp. 163-186). Proceedings of the
Denver Museum of Nature and Science, series 4, number 1.
KellerLynn,
K. (2006). Florissant Fossil Beds National Monument Geologic Resource Evaluation
Report. Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2006/009. National
Parks Service, Denver, Colorado
Matthews,
V., KellerLynn, K., and Fox, B. (2003). Messages in Stone: Colorado’s
Colorful Geology. Canada: Colorado Geologic Survey.
Meyer,
H.W. (2003). The Fossils of Florissant. Washington: Smithsonian Books.
O’Brien,
N.R., Meyer, H.W., Reilly, K., Ross, A.M., and Maguire, S., (2002). Microbial
taphonomic processes in the fossilization of insects and plants in the late Eocene
Florissant Formation, Colorado: Rocky Mountain Geology, v. 17, pp. 1-11).
Prothero,
D.R. and Sanchez, F., (2004). Magnetic stratigraphy of the upper Eocene Florissant
Formation, Teller County, Colorado. In Lucas, S.G., Zeigler, K.E., and Kondrashov,
P.E. [Eds.]. Paleogene Mammals. (pp. 129-135). New Mexico Museum of
Natural History and Science Bulletin 26. |
|
|
|
|